On 22/04/10 14:54, Charles Jardine wrote: > On 21/04/10 18:56, Everett, Timothy S wrote: >> Thank you for the patch. This fixed the ORA-24334 problem. > > Thank you very much for testing the patch. I will try to ensure that > a similar fix gets into the next release of DBD::Oracle. > >> The test suite now runs to completion. FYI it still complains about one >> subtest in 58object.t. > > I would be very grateful if you could help me get to the bottom of this > problem as well. I have attached a modified version of t/58object.t. > Could you possibly run this and send the output to me. (It will > be tracing at level 9 - I don't think we need to bother the list > with the output.)
On 22/04/10 19:16, Everett, Timothy S wrote: > Charles, > > Thanks again for your help. I ran your updated 58object.t and attached > the output. Thank you for the trace. It looks line another bug revealed buy using big endian hardware. I attach another patch, which I think will fix the problem. This patch is independent of the previous one, since it patches a different source file. I will again be grateful if you can report back on this patch. > FYI, 58object.t appears to be the only file formatted as DOS text > (explicit ^M at the end of every record). I've run the tests with the > original file and after removing the carriage returns. It doesn't > affect the test results. I will mention this to John Scoles, the maintainer of DBD::Oracle, when I report the problems you have found. -- Charles Jardine - Computing Service, University of Cambridge c...@cam.ac.uk Tel: +44 1223 334506, Fax: +44 1223 334679
