Nilson Santos Figueiredo Junior wrote: >On 6/23/06, Matt S Trout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>Get 0.06003 from CPAN. ActiveState can't package for shit. >> >> > >Note that the reason why 0.06003 (and 0.06002, don't know about >0.06001) probably isn't available as a PPM package is because there >are failing test cases (in t\cdbi-t\02-Film). So, even if he got it >from the CPAN, it would still require a forced install. > > Thanks for the heads-up. Current Active State Perl does install a working CPAN shell, and so I have 0.6003 forced in now.
>ActiveState packages the latest module version which has no failing >tests, hence, 0.06003 will never be available from them. This is a >reasonable policy since PPM packages are expected to work and not just >be a fancy different way of distributing Perl modules. > > You can find the DBIx::Class automated build output for each Active State package and platform here: http://ppm.activestate.com/BuildStatus/5.8-D.html So this link has the test output for 0.6003 on Win32: http://ppm.activestate.com/BuildStatus/5.8-windows/windows-5.8/DBIx-Class-0.06003.txt However, that long error output looks nothing like my CPAN report which was just t\cdbi-t\02-Film....................NOK 67# Failed test 'No warnings so far' # in t\cdbi-t\02-Film.t at line 247. # got: '2' # expected: '0' t\cdbi-t\02-Film....................NOK 68# Failed test 'DESTROY without update warns' # in t\cdbi-t\02-Film.t at line 250. # got: '3' # expected: '1' Could the difference in error output be because Active State build all their 5.8.X series modules with Perl 5.8.0? Just in case anyone is interested :-) Steven _______________________________________________ List: http://lists.rawmode.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbix-class Wiki: http://dbix-class.shadowcatsystems.co.uk/ IRC: irc.perl.org#dbix-class SVN: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/repos/bast/trunk/DBIx-Class/ Searchable Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
