On 5/8/07, Matt S Trout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 09:54:36AM -0700, Michael Higgins wrote:
> Reply to myself again...
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Michael Higgins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Michael Higgins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > > SQL::Abstract::Limit _seems_ responsible for the errors. If
> > I pass the
> > > reference, it carps about ORDER BY SCALAR(0x85d842c) DESC and if I
> > > don't, then it complains bad column order spec:
> > > "Invoice #" DESC.
> >
> > [8<]
> [8<]
> >
> > Obviously, this ain't a real patch. But, it got me around the
> > problem... I think. At least, I believe I've isolated the glitch...
> >
> > Is there another way to honor the 'pass this sql through like
> > it is' for order_by with paged results?
>
> Since no one replied with an approved workaround, I have to assume this, or
> like this, is the fix. So, I've posted a bug report here:
>
> http://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=26558
>
>
> Can anyone suggest a better approach to getting a new release that works as
> expected with DBIC?
Yah, give us a hand integrating the functionality down into SQL::Abstract in
a cleaner manner, since the DBIC team is now maintaining that as well :)
What? Someone will respond to my patch submissions now? Time to go
through my old emails and stop feeling so bad for passing around a
long ago bastardized copy of SQL::Abstract to my clients.
_______________________________________________
List: http://lists.rawmode.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbix-class
Wiki: http://dbix-class.shadowcatsystems.co.uk/
IRC: irc.perl.org#dbix-class
SVN: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/repos/bast/trunk/DBIx-Class/
Searchable Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
