On 10/23/2016 10:55 PM, Christian Walde wrote:
On Sun, 23 Oct 2016 22:19:42 +0200, Andrew Beverley <a...@andybev.com>
wrote:
- Riba was prepared to keep maintaining (and "tightening" in slower
time) "DBIC"
As far as i understood there was no circumstance under which he'd have
been involved further, at all.
The situation has changed. Notably I have taken up employment where (all
current plans considered) I will have to maintain at minimum a private
fork of DBIx::Class for my own use.
In light of several proposals on the list, the gist of my *revised*
position is:
- If there is sufficient interest in myself continuing to be the sole
gatekeeper/point of responsibility for the DBIx::Class distribution
and
- Folks are not concerned with neither my tangibly limited availability
going forward (I started a 40h/week job), nor with the potential
conflict of interest (i.e. that I might slip up and put $work concerns
ahead of the userbase)
and
- All current comaints are content with relinquishing their claims to
the namespace and continuing building up on my work outside of the
DBIx::Class distribution
Then, yes: I suppose you can consider this a proposal to avail myself to
keeping the preexisting actual setup unchanged for the foreseeable future.
RIBASUSHI
_______________________________________________
List: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbix-class
IRC: irc.perl.org#dbix-class
SVN: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/repos/bast/DBIx-Class/
Searchable Archive: http://www.grokbase.com/group/dbix-class@lists.scsys.co.uk
