+1 from me too, well expressed Matt. I also wanted to add that it really feels to me like people are only focused on the negatives of a split. Reduced resources. That simply isn't the case here, we're left with a solid dbic with a commitment from riba to continue supporting it, all be with a reduction in hours. We then have a second project with the new found freedom to break api's and trial new features with a group of excited coders wanting to jump in.
Martin On 26 Oct 2016 9:20 p.m., "Charlie Garrison" <garri...@zeta.org.au> wrote: > Good morning, > > On 27 Oct 2016, at 0:50, Matthew Phillips wrote: > > So, given a choice between a proven quantity, and an unproven (and in Frew >> and I's opinion almost non-existent) quantity, it seems like the obvious >> choice for Peter to continue. The gratitude expressed for Peter's immense >> amount of work over the past few years from the users (and me) during these >> past few weeks points to this. >> > > Thanks Matt. That’s what I’ve been thinking during this conversation but > wasn’t sure how to express it. > > +1 Peter > > Charlie > -- > > Charlie Garrison <garri...@zeta.org.au> > github.com/cngarrison metacpan.org/author/CNG > > _______________________________________________ > List: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbix-class > IRC: irc.perl.org#dbix-class > SVN: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/repos/bast/DBIx-Class/ > Searchable Archive: http://www.grokbase.com/group/ > dbix-class@lists.scsys.co.uk
_______________________________________________ List: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbix-class IRC: irc.perl.org#dbix-class SVN: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/repos/bast/DBIx-Class/ Searchable Archive: http://www.grokbase.com/group/dbix-class@lists.scsys.co.uk
