On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 12:23:36PM +0100, Peter Rabbitson wrote: > On 11/02/2016 11:53 AM, Peter Rabbitson wrote: > >I will publish a to-the-point workable proposal by the end > >of this week. > > > > Apologies for the delay yet again. Recent emails made articulating > my point more difficult, so I am still thinking on how to properly > respond. There are too many misconception (like e.g. that a fork is > avoidable), and a manner of addressing them all still evades me.
Yeah, that's why I asked for monday, let me spend the weekend thinking. Plus it was easier for me since I already had most of a proposal and just needed to edit it. Meanwhile, given I responded to your 'citation needed' request, it'd be much appreciated if you could respond to my p5p question in the mean time; I did my best to ask the question in an unprejudicial fashion, and I think your answer should also help to further highlight where we differ. -- Matt S Trout - Shadowcat Systems - Perl consulting with a commit bit and a clue http://shadowcat.co.uk/blog/matt-s-trout/ http://twitter.com/shadowcat_mst/ Email me now on mst (at) shadowcat.co.uk and let's chat about how our CPAN commercial support, training and consultancy packages could help your team. _______________________________________________ List: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbix-class IRC: irc.perl.org#dbix-class SVN: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/repos/bast/DBIx-Class/ Searchable Archive: http://www.grokbase.com/group/dbix-class@lists.scsys.co.uk