On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 12:34:20AM +0800, Bill Hacker wrote: > Feargal Reilly wrote: > >Finally, as I mentioned, I have no experience with IMAP, so should a > >spam mailbox be called 'Spam', '/Spam', or something else? > > > > So long as DBMail relies on external daemonss for IMAP, it is likely to > be 'INBOX.<something>', but I would suggest a short name "other than > SPAM", on the grounds that: > > - IF we were *certain* it was spam, we probably wouldn't deliver it at all. > > - "Probable spam" seems appropriate if the luser wishes to reiew it in > case his filters are over zealous, but may be too long a name for > convenience... > > - How about "Suspect" (INBOX.Suspect)
dbmail doesn't use the (cyrus?) convention of INBOX.mailbox, so just 'Suspect' or 'Suspect/Spam' are options. xn
