> Is there any progress on the cached_header_types? I see you email at:
> http://mailman.fastxs.net/pipermail/dbmail/2003-December/003886.html

  I've not heard of anyone working on it with dbmail.  I've started
playing with it in weDBmail, but (in addition to lack of time) I've
kind of been waiting for dbmail's schema to emerge so I can have
weDBmail use dbmail's tables, not it's own.  (dbmail support for it
will probably be added in 2.2 or later, but I'll probably backport
it into 1.2 for weDBmail, we'll just have to do all the header
parsing/caching ourselves)

--
Jesse Norell

[EMAIL PROTECTED] is not my email address;
change "administrator" to my first name.
--

Reply via email to