I wonder what message dbmail-smtp should send to the MTA when the header
is to big: EX_DATAERR?
EX_TEMPFAIL does not seem like the right messages, but I wonder if
EX_DATAERR would be understood by the MTA.
Any ideas?
Ilja
Ilja Booij wrote:
for now I'll go for bouncing messages with ueberlong headers. Later on,
we'll have to decide on a nice strategy to work with longer headers.
Ilja
Aaron Stone wrote:
For the uber-large headers problem, would you rather bounce the
message or add
the is_header column to the messageblks table and allow for multiple
header
blocks? Also, since we currently pass the header around as a single char
array, how would you propose to throttle the memory usage so that someone
cannot DoS the server with garbage jigabyte headers?
Aaron
Ilja Booij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Hi,
I'd like to release rc4 tomorrow. Is anybody aware of any
showstoppers we have to fix before releasing rc4 other than the ones
I'll mention below?
* Headers > 512kB don't work. Messages get dropped.
* code indentation: run indent -i8 -kr (unless anybody wants
something completely different :) )
Ilja
_______________________________________________
Dbmail-dev mailing list
Dbmail-dev@dbmail.org
http://twister.fastxs.net/mailman/listinfo/dbmail-dev
_______________________________________________
Dbmail-dev mailing list
Dbmail-dev@dbmail.org
http://twister.fastxs.net/mailman/listinfo/dbmail-dev
