On Thu, 2004-07-22 at 01:12, Aaron Stone wrote: > I've discussed this to death on the mailing lists. Full configurability is > scheduled for 2.1, in the mean time, we ought to begin rolling out some kind > of reasonable prefix. >
This whole feature should be scheduled for 2.1, it's pretty late in the release candidate stage to be asking everyone who's been tracking it closely to screw up their interfaces now. > Third party applications that directly interface with the dbmail tables will > just have to be updated to the final 2.0 release specification. Those who've > been following CVS and early release candidates know that changes have been > made and should be expected until we hit a final stable release. > A large number of these changes should be in 2.1 and not 2.0, especially after 6 or 7 release candidates... Ryan
