Why?
Even though it does break rfc compliance, nobody noticed this until you reported it. It's not like this will
break functionality. No major clients have trouble with the recent flag being set on all messages, they simply
ignore it and follow their own cache. Do you have any experiences to the contrary?
Bug 97 will be fixed in the 2.1 codebase. Fixing it is not trivial by far, the best way to do it still has to
be decided upon. So it's a no-go for 2.0.
Alessandro Magnolo wrote:
On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 17:04:30 +0200, Ilja Booij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
There isn't a specific date yet... But:
What bugs in the bugtracker are showstoppers?
IMHO, bug #97 should be resolved before releasing 2.0.
_______________________________________________
Dbmail-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://twister.fastxs.net/mailman/listinfo/dbmail-dev
--
________________________________________________________________
Paul Stevens mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
NET FACILITIES GROUP PGP: finger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The Netherlands________________________________http://www.nfg.nl
