""Wolfram A. Kraushaar"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> :) > > What about using popt instead of getopt in a future version? Popt looks pretty neat, and it's small and portable and gives us long options without relying on GNU getopt_long. So, if we decide to do long options, we should probably move to popt at the same time. Currently in CVS, and waiting to be reborn in 2.1, is the Sieve command line tool. We might consider popt-ing it first, since it probably will need to be rewritten before 2.2 comes out -- but if not, let's not make unneeded work. Aaron --
