Matthew T. O'Connor <matthew@zeut.net> said: > Paul J Stevens wrote: >> >> Only clean and well tested fixes. No more butt-ugly hacks just for >> performance sake. > > Amen my brother! Please let the 2.0 branch not be a moving target! > Accecpt it's limitations and make the improvements in 2.1.
Are there only bugfixes and new features, or is there a middle ground where we improve and mature the application? In my experience, there should always a be someplace for non-drastic changes to go, otherwise you lose the feeling of motion on a project and everything becomes this nebulous, "Oh, just wait for verion X.Y and we'll have that feature." Aaron
