> We can *easily* switch to storing attachments separately. The whole > messageblk approach will support this > flawlessly. In fact, I can switch to storing attachments in separate blks > today, and noone will notice because > it will be transparant from the point of view of message retrieval.
I hope this comment was geared towards 2.1 and not 2.0. Just remember that the stable series has a lot of custom created scripts that might not work when such changes are made. I just wanted to point that out since I believe in stability over performance and features. -=Dead2=-
