On Wed, 2006-06-21 at 16:53 -0500, Jim C. Nasby wrote: > Of course, it goes without saying that DBMail should be coded to reduce > the likelyhood of any possibility of an attack.
Totally. And not to rain on this parade, but as I don't have enough spare cycles right now to read and fully digest these emails as they're going by, please be sure to distill one or two architecture ideas down to reasonable implementation plans on the wiki. It'll honestly be like a year before we can get to them in earnest, but if it's "on paper" then at least it can sink in during that time. The replication plans are in that state right now -- there's a really good spec on the wiki, just waiting for an open development cycle to get hammered into code. Aaron
