Steve, Dbmail doesn't need more segments than processes running. The fact that we're sometimes seeing this behaviour indicates a bug in dbmail.
Steve Cox wrote: > Hello, > > This is teetering on "unrelated", but my /proc/sys/kernel/shmmni was set > to 4096, and I was getting the same error. I've increased it to 16384. > Is this too extreme? Is it going to cause any potential issues for my > system? And how many shared segments does DBmail need? (SVN 2304/Debian > Etch/PGSQL) > > > >>From "man *shmget*": > > ENOSPC All possible shared memory id's have been taken > (SHMMNI), or allocating a segment of the requested size would cause the > system to exceed the system-wide limit on shared memory (SHMALL). > > > Check/adjust /proc/sys/kernel/shm* > > > > On Wed, 2006-10-04 at 10:22 +0200, Herr Lars Kneschke wrote: >> Hello! >> >> What could be the reason for this error message? >> >> I get this error message on a ubuntu edgy eft system with self >> compiled dbmail and libsieve packages. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Dbmail-dev mailing list >> Dbmail-dev[at]dbmail.org >> http://twister.fastxs.net/mailman/listinfo/dbmail-dev -- ________________________________________________________________ Paul Stevens paul at nfg.nl NET FACILITIES GROUP GPG/PGP: 1024D/11F8CD31 The Netherlands________________________________http://www.nfg.nl
