The following issue has been SUBMITTED. 
====================================================================== 
http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/view.php?id=464 
====================================================================== 
Reported By:                dirixmjm
Assigned To:                
====================================================================== 
Project:                    DBMail
Issue ID:                   464
Category:                   Authentication layer
Reproducibility:            always
Severity:                   major
Priority:                   normal
Status:                     new
target:                      
====================================================================== 
Date Submitted:             02-Dec-06 10:15 CET
Last Modified:              02-Dec-06 10:15 CET
====================================================================== 
Summary:                    Strange usermap behaviour.
Description: 
Hi,


I expected login to fail, but somehow succeed.


I have dbmail_usermap as follow:
 login |       sock_allow        | sock_deny |     userid
-------+-------------------------+-----------+-----------------
ANY   | inet:10.0.0.6:110       |           | [EMAIL PROTECTED]


All users are in the database as this user: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Now I try to login with pop, and username admintmp. This works very well,
namely
admintmp is changed to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and the user is authenticated.

However now I try to connect with imap, *without* changing the above
dbmail_usermap.
One would think loggin in with only admintmp would fail, but it doesn't.
admintmp also get's extended with foo.com, and authentication works as
with pop.

This is strange behaviour not?
To be sure:

#dbmail-users -l admintmp
Nothing found searching for [admintmp].
Command failed.

====================================================================== 

Issue History 
Date Modified   Username       Field                    Change               
====================================================================== 
02-Dec-06 10:15 dirixmjm       New Issue                                    
======================================================================

Reply via email to