Justin McAleer wrote: > Progress is progress. Let me know if I can help with any debugging. > > Aaron Stone wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 2, 2007, Justin McAleer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >> >> >>> Has any progress been made on the imapd memory leak? >> >> There are some fixes in SVN, so 2.2.2 will be an improvement over 2.2.1, >> but it does not appear to be a complete fix. We'll have to collect more >> data and continue narrowing down the referenced but forgotten gmime >> objects.
Those 'fixes' don't address *any* leakage at all. But they do address the general footprint by reducing memory usage in a couple of places. No significant leakage can be detected using the current test cases, afaik. -- ________________________________________________________________ Paul Stevens paul at nfg.nl NET FACILITIES GROUP GPG/PGP: 1024D/11F8CD31 The Netherlands________________________________http://www.nfg.nl _______________________________________________ Dbmail-dev mailing list [email protected] http://twister.fastxs.net/mailman/listinfo/dbmail-dev
