Aaron Stone wrote: > I wonder if this isn't a good place to use memcached. My Inbox has just > shy of 50k messages -- I'm not running 2.3 yet, but could make a copy to > see if it falls over.
I love memcached. Great stuff for mostly-reads websites, afaik. But I don't see how to use it in dbmail. Or at least, not until dbmail has a proper caching layer internally whose memory footprint needs to scale beyond the local server. But you probably know more about memcached deployments and use-cases :-) -- ________________________________________________________________ Paul Stevens paul at nfg.nl NET FACILITIES GROUP GPG/PGP: 1024D/11F8CD31 The Netherlands________________________________http://www.nfg.nl _______________________________________________ Dbmail-dev mailing list [email protected] http://twister.fastxs.net/mailman/listinfo/dbmail-dev
