On Freitag 27 Februar 2009 Bokhan Artem wrote:
> > dbmail-2.2 is slower than cyrus.
>
> Do you mean iops, throughput or both?
> I'm absolutely sure that cyrus will win both 2.2/2.3 when it used
> with small amount of connections, with small amount of messages per
> mailbox.

Might be that dbmail will saturate slower and maybe it can handle more 
connections, I can tell. Just for my personal mailserver, with 4 
accounts having 10GB mail, on my local mini-server within XEN, I could 
heavily feel the difference. After applying all the performance settings 
I wrote in the wiki plus tuning postgresql.conf, it now runs smooth and 
I can work without getting a PITA.

Our customer with many big mails, like I said before, have about 83GB 
mail storage used in cyrus now. I wonder how much that will be in 
dbmail-2.3, and how fast. I didn't dare to implement 2.2 for them, and 
prefer to wait for 2.4. Maybe we can make it lightning fast until then 
:-)

mfg zmi
-- 
// Michael Monnerie, Ing.BSc    -----      http://it-management.at
// Tel: 0660 / 415 65 31                      .network.your.ideas.
// PGP Key:         "curl -s http://zmi.at/zmi.asc | gpg --import"
// Fingerprint: AC19 F9D5 36ED CD8A EF38  500E CE14 91F7 1C12 09B4
// Keyserver: wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net                  Key-ID: 1C1209B4

_______________________________________________
Dbmail-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://twister.fastxs.net/mailman/listinfo/dbmail-dev

Reply via email to