Hi Jacques,
it is the MUA's job. See rfc2298 (http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2298.txt)
However, note that:
"The presence of a Disposition-Notification-To header in a message is
merely a request for an MDN. The recipients' user agents are always
free to silently ignore such a request. Alternatively, an explicit
denial of the request for information about the disposition of the
message may be sent using the "denied" disposition in an MDN."
regards,
Leander
On 1-apr-04, at 7:11, Jacques Beaudoin wrote:
I got my wire cross i now know that:
1 - dbmail as nothing to do with "return receipts" but it
may be the (M)essage (T)ransfert (A)gent (postfix) that has.....
2 - postfix as nothing to do with "return receipts" but it
may be (U)ser (A)gent (Outlook,netscape,horde/imp..) that has.....
3 - Outlook,netscape,horde/imp... as almost nothing to do with
"return receipts" and it may be (h)uman that has.....
4 - Just ask the human to send you a "return receipts".....
5 - Is that the picture about "return receipts" and should
i tell all my boses to stop asking me to implement "return
receipts"
Thanks
Jacques
_______________________________________________
Dbmail mailing list
Dbmail@dbmail.org
https://mailman.fastxs.nl/mailman/listinfo/dbmail
