On Dienstag 11 August 2009 Reindl Harald wrote: > Please do not missunderstand me: Because of this things i got as > nearly no sleep searching and patching things that should work out of > the box while our customers are standing with a loaded gun behind me
By shouting at people you won't get more help. If you offer to pay Paul for a feature you need, or ask very friendly, maybe he'd implement it quickly. Just last week he implemented IPv6 support within a short time. On the other hand, Paul, having secure methods directly implemented would really be nice. Just because the *MD5 methods require plaintext pwds doesn't mean it shouldn't be implemented. It should just be disabled by those having encrypted pwds. (/me having cleartext pwds, so could use the feature now *g*). As far as I could read from your words, it should be easy to implement? mfg zmi -- // Michael Monnerie, Ing.BSc ----- http://it-management.at // Tel: 0660 / 415 65 31 .network.your.ideas. // PGP Key: "curl -s http://zmi.at/zmi.asc | gpg --import" // Fingerprint: AC19 F9D5 36ED CD8A EF38 500E CE14 91F7 1C12 09B4 // Keyserver: wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net Key-ID: 1C1209B4
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ DBmail mailing list DBmail@dbmail.org http://mailman.fastxs.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbmail
