Kavitha Srinivas wrote: > Actually I wonder if it makes sense to annotate the relation with the > actual conditional probability as suggested by Tim. We found the > probabilities quite useful in different applications. If we go this > route we could also send you the set of types with very low > probabilities -- which is very useful if you want to know for instance > that an instance is almost never both a Car and a Person.
Publishing the conditional probabilities available in some form (not necessarily RDF) is a great idea. People could use this data in many ways, I think. It's less clear to me how this might be integrated into DBpedia or the LOD cloud. But having the data available should facilitate experimentation with how to best use it. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ Dbpedia-discussion mailing list Dbpedia-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-discussion
