Dear DBpedians,

I am trying to read all categories for a subject, including the 
transitive closure w.r.t. skos:broader.

My query to attempt this is
SELECT ?subject WHERE {dbpedia:Tim_Berners-Lee dcterms:subject ?s . ?s 
skos:broader ?subject OPTION(TRANSITIVE, T_DISTINCT, 
T_IN(?s),T_OUT(?subject),T_MIN(0))}

While the first results look sensible, scrolling down the lists yields 
categories such as
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Religion_in_Egypt
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Ethnic_groups_in_Slovenia
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Subjects_taught_in_medical_school
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Water_in_France
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Low-energy_building

...just to name a few, see
http://dbpedia.org/sparql?default-graph-uri=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org&query=SELECT+%3Fsubject+WHERE+{dbpedia%3ATim_Berners-Lee+dcterms%3Asubject+%3Fs+.+%3Fs+skos%3Abroader+%3Fsubject+OPTION%28TRANSITIVE%2C+T_DISTINCT%2C+T_IN%28%3Fs%29%2CT_OUT%28%3Fsubject%29%2CT_MIN%280%29%29}&format=text%2Fhtml&timeout=30000&debug=on

Is there something wrong with my query, or is the category tree in 
Wikipedia that strange? Trying other subjects gives me equally weird 
results.

Thank you for your support,
Heiko

-- 
Dr. Heiko Paulheim
Research Group Data and Web Science
University of Mannheim
Phone: +49 621 181 2646
B6, 26, Room C1.08
D-68159 Mannheim

Mail: he...@informatik.uni-mannheim.de
Web: www.heikopaulheim.com


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
October Webinars: Code for Performance
Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance.
Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from 
the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register >
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60135031&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Dbpedia-discussion mailing list
Dbpedia-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-discussion

Reply via email to