Hi, <@Dimitris, do you know if this is technically doable?>
And would it be possible to give some kind of estimate about the impact of what we would consider to be major changes? So would I, for instance, be very happy if we could move the whole branch of GovernmentAdministriation classes from being a subclass of Place to being a subclass of Agent. In principle, a class is just a tag about the type of collection a resource belongs to, however, maybe there would be major implications as to the domains and ranges of a lot of properties. Regards, Gerard ________________________________________ Van: Marco Fossati [hell.j....@gmail.com] Verzonden: woensdag 26 maart 2014 11:13 Aan: dbpedia-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net Onderwerp: Re: [Dbpedia-discussion] Odp: Re: Re: DBpedia ontology - predicate constraints Hi guys, On 3/25/14, 7:07 PM, Dimitris Kontokostas wrote: > The workflow should be like this: 1) make your changes 2) provide the > rational for the change in the talk page of the property / class, 3) if > needed, discuss and coordinate efforts, 4) use the mailing list for very > big changes. I completely agree with this. People can go ahead when dealing with minor changes e.g. labels. On the other hand, I would adopt a Wikipedia-style protection policy [1] to avoid under-the-hood major changes e.g. addition/deletion of classes/properties. @Dimitris, do you know if this is technically doable? Cheers! [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Protection_policy -- Marco Fossati http://about.me/marco.fossati Twitter: @hjfocs Skype: hell_j ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book "Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and their applications. Written by three acclaimed leaders in the field, this first edition is now available. Download your free book today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/13534_NeoTech _______________________________________________ Dbpedia-discussion mailing list Dbpedia-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-discussion Disclaimer Dit bericht met eventuele bijlagen is vertrouwelijk en uitsluitend bestemd voor de geadresseerde. Indien u niet de bedoelde ontvanger bent, wordt u verzocht de afzender te waarschuwen en dit bericht met eventuele bijlagen direct te verwijderen en/of te vernietigen. Het is niet toegestaan dit bericht en eventuele bijlagen te vermenigvuldigen, door te sturen, openbaar te maken, op te slaan of op andere wijze te gebruiken. Ordina N.V. en/of haar groepsmaatschappijen accepteren geen verantwoordelijkheid of aansprakelijkheid voor schade die voortvloeit uit de inhoud en/of de verzending van dit bericht. This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and are solely intended for the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender and delete and/or destroy this message and any attachments immediately. It is prohibited to copy, to distribute, to disclose or to use this e-mail and any attachments in any other way. Ordina N.V. and/or its group companies do not accept any responsibility nor liability for any damage resulting from the content of and/or the transmission of this message. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book "Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and their applications. Written by three acclaimed leaders in the field, this first edition is now available. Download your free book today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/13534_NeoTech _______________________________________________ Dbpedia-discussion mailing list Dbpedia-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-discussion
