Hi, there are owl:sameAs triples like these in the http://dbpedia.org graph:
<http://data.nytimes.com/55761554936313344161> owl:sameAs <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Germany> <http://data.nytimes.com/55761554936313344161> owl:sameAs <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Montenegro> http://dbpedia.org/sparql?default-graph-uri=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org&qtxt=select+distinct+*+where+{%0D%0A++%3Fi+owl%3AsameAs+%3Fj+.%0D%0A++FILTER%28+%3Fi%3D%3Chttp%3A%2F%2Fdata.nytimes.com%2F55761554936313344161%3E+%29%0D%0A}&format=text%2Fhtml&timeout=30000&debug=on <http://data.nytimes.com/N84789043836346105961> owl:sameAs <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Galveston,_Texas> <http://data.nytimes.com/N84789043836346105961> owl:sameAs <http://dbpedia.org/resource/United_States> http://dbpedia.org/sparql?default-graph-uri=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org&qtxt=select+distinct+*+where+{%0D%0A++%3Fi+owl%3AsameAs+%3Fj+.%0D%0A++FILTER%28+%3Fi%3D%3Chttp%3A%2F%2Fdata.nytimes.com%2FN84789043836346105961%3E+%29%0D%0A}&format=text%2Fhtml&timeout=30000&debug=on Needless to say that this is problematic if you do owl:sameAs reasoning... Is this the right place to report things like that? What can i do to help? Cheers, Jörn ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Want excitement? Manually upgrade your production database. When you want reliability, choose Perforce Perforce version control. Predictably reliable. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=157508191&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Dbpedia-discussion mailing list Dbpedia-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-discussion
