Hi Vladimir,

Thanks for your remarks. I'll address them in a couple of days.

Kind regards,

Gerard

________________________________________
Van: Vladimir Alexiev <vladimir.alex...@ontotext.com>
Verzonden: dinsdag 5 januari 2016 11:38
Aan: Kuys, Gerard; dbpedia-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net; 'Monika Solanki'
Onderwerp: RE: Aligning DBpedia ontology with the UDC

I looked at http://www.udcsummary.info/ and still don't understand your
proposal.

1. UDC allows you to express e.g. this:
159.96 Special mental states and processes
61=030.161.1=133.1 Medical documents translated from Russian into French
What DBpedia classes would this correspond to?

2. UDC has areas of study, but not specific objects. E.g. you have
737  Numismatics
But don't have "coin" vs "hoard" vs e.g. "medal"

3. You have a huge number of classes that don't correspond to objects, eg
581.1  Plant physiology
581.8  Plant histology
581.5  Habits of plants. Plant behaviour. Plant ecology. Plant ethology. The
plant and its environment. Bionomics of plan
These would just add parasitic weight to a mapping.

The different kinds of plants are under 582.32/.998  Plantae (plants) (I
guess the complete Tree of Life can be found in UDC, as it can in Wikidata
project Taxonomy)

4. You have a good classification of sports under
79  Recreation. Entertainment. Games. Sport
And more specifically under
796  Sport. Games. Physical exercises
But afaik, you don't have a class SportsTeam, let alone specifics such as
BaseballTeam vs SoccerTeam

As you say, UDC is for classification of works, most of all on paper (books,
articles, papers).
IMHO it's not for classification of objects.


Disclaimer
Dit bericht met eventuele bijlagen is vertrouwelijk en uitsluitend bestemd voor 
de geadresseerde. Indien u niet de bedoelde ontvanger bent, wordt u verzocht de 
afzender te waarschuwen en dit bericht met eventuele bijlagen direct te 
verwijderen en/of te vernietigen. Het is niet toegestaan dit bericht en 
eventuele bijlagen te vermenigvuldigen, door te sturen, openbaar te maken, op 
te slaan of op andere wijze te gebruiken. Ordina N.V. en/of haar 
groepsmaatschappijen accepteren geen verantwoordelijkheid of aansprakelijkheid 
voor schade die voortvloeit uit de inhoud en/of de verzending van dit bericht.

This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and are solely intended for 
the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender 
and delete and/or destroy this message and any attachments immediately. It is 
prohibited to copy, to distribute, to disclose or to use this e-mail and any 
attachments in any other way. Ordina N.V. and/or its group companies do not 
accept any responsibility nor liability for any damage resulting from the 
content of and/or the transmission of this message.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Dbpedia-discussion mailing list
Dbpedia-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-discussion

Reply via email to