On 17 May 2011, at 13:29, Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote: > On Tue, 17 May 2011 15:20:30 +0300, Pasi Sarolahti <pasi.sarola...@iki.fi> > wrote: >> Based on the earlier concluded WGLC, I assume the other parts are still ok >> with the WG, unless somebody says otherwise. I hope people can check the new >> SDP text, and send any comments soon. > > There are still absolute zero considerations for programming interfaces. And > with it, my concern that the duplicated pairs of port numbers will make it > hard if at all possible to integrate in existing applications. VLC won't be > able to implement this extension to DCCP and I really wonder if anyone > actually uses it.
What's the concern here? Use the IANA registered port, unless specified otherwise by the application. Any UDP tunnelling solutions must specify a UDP port. -- Colin Perkins http://csperkins.org/
