On 19 May 2011, at 12:54, Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote: > On Wed, 18 May 2011 07:24:19 +0100, Colin Perkins <c...@csperkins.org> wrote: >>> It might be that the API makes the problem go away, but that seems like a >>> risky bet in the absence of any sketch of an API (it would not need to be >>> normative). > >> Do you want to propose an API? > > I have no _sane_ ideas how to build an API that works with the current > proposal, that's why I'm concerned.
What do you need other than one new socket option to indicate that UDP encapsulation is to be used and to provide the port? I must be missing something, since the API doesn't seem difficult. -- Colin Perkins http://csperkins.org/
