Sweet..
I'll subscribe to the ojb lists to get more involved.
Should use ojb in my projects anyway ;)
While I am at it i'll subscribe to torque too.
Btw did you already have a look at the xmlbeans example that uses ddlutils ?
Mvgr,
Martin
Thomas Dudziak wrote:
On 12/21/05, Martin van den Bemt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Perhaps we can interest some other PMC members to take a slightly more
active role in DdlUtils, e.g. actively using it and perhaps running
the tests and checking the docs ?
I only know Thomas Mahler and you :)
Since everyone became committer on db, so all projects had easy access, I
suspect the plan behind this that OJB and Torque are actually going to use
ddlutils (not following these lists currently, so correct me if they are
already depending on ddlutils..).
Do you know of any current plans to start using ddlutils ?
Not exactly. When commons-sql was migrated, I asked for giving commit
rights to the Torque and OJB committers to make adoption easier. So
e.g. Derby and JDO committers do not automatically have commit rights
for DdlUtils.
OJB is starting to adopt DdlUtils (I added it for testing against
Derby, and the Head will switch over to DdlUtils once the release is
out, I think). Torque does not currently, but I wanted to approach
them once we have a release out.
Tom
