Hi Thomas,
Thomas Fischer wrote:
The main question is: is it ok if enough PMC members vote yes even if
they are not (active) committers of the project (but assuming that
they actually checked the project). A lot of the DB comitters members
have commit rights on DdlUtils, and some of them PMC members.
Ah ok.. forgot about that. Where is everyone ? ;)
*very loud ping* :)
I'll definitely look into ddlutils if it is time to vote a release and
use my vote.
Good the hear..
BTW, A ping just on the ddlutils-dev list is not a very loud ping IMHO :-).
Loud enough for the moment :). It also gives me an idea that people are
reading/lurking on what is happening here.. I got more response than I thought
I was going to get, so it's looking good :)
With regard to use ddlutils in torque, this is a matter I wanted to look
into but did not find the time yet. (There are a lot if things on my 'I
should look into this' list, I'm afraid, definitely more than on my
christmas wish list ;-) ). Torque has a generator which does some of the
tasks which ddlutils do, and some that will not covered by ddlutils
(like automatic creation of Torque classes), so the generator will be
here to stay. But even the sql tasks would need to be looked into
carefully, to ensure that the results stay compatible, which is a lot of
work for all the different databases around. I hope I have time to look
into this further the next couple of weeks, and write a follow-up.
We all have the problem of finding some spare time indeed :)
I'll await your follow-up. Especially interesting area is where ddlutils is
lacking compared to Torque.
Mvgr,
Martin
