>>this is a re-dating, then, not a new tape, because this tape has been in >>circulation for years & years labeled "2/22/74". > >Yes, that's what I thought I was saying.
You did, and you did it well. David
>>this is a re-dating, then, not a new tape, because this tape has been in >>circulation for years & years labeled "2/22/74". > >Yes, that's what I thought I was saying.
You did, and you did it well. David