I haven't found much reason of late to browse Deadlists, but a few pokes around and it's patently obvious that Deadlists is nowhere near as accurate as it could be, given the overall body of knowledge as of 2002. There are numerous errors and omissions that simple attention on the part of the contributors and caretakers could easily rectify - and I'm not the pot calling the kettle black - I'm as guilty as the next guy. But given this present state of Deadlists, throwing criticism at the Compendium for its errors and omissions certainly is a case of the pot calling the kettle black.
Gordon S
