> The way I see it, deadlists is like an online baseball encyclopedia, while > the Compendium series is more like a biographical history of the game's > players and teams. If I want the hard stats in their latest updated form, > I'll hit the online encyclopedia. If I want to read somebody's perspective > on what it was like to watch a given player or team play, I'll read the > biographical history. When it comes to the Grateful Dead, I use the same > approach with deadlists and the Compendium series. > > ----Scott
I agree with your point of view. Neither resource is 100% perfect; together they deliver valuable information, albiet with different missions. Bottom line is the collective body of knowledge represented in both efforts is a work in process without an end. I use both resources and will continue to. Negative barbs and personal attacks is a waste of time and do not belong on the list. Paul
