these are excellent suggestions. does someone want to caretake this material separately? I think this might be best because of how much of it is not identified to a particular year.
> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > John F. Whitehead > Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 2:39 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Rehearsals > > > kevin wrote: > > I've been wanting to add rehearsals to the database (along with > > cancelled/rescheduled dates) with a mechanism in place to > filter the > > listing type for those who don't want to view/search them with the > > regular set lists. > > obviously the data spec should be altered without cause, but > I think this is an important and worthy piece of metadata. a > new database field TYPE (or PERFORMANCE) would do the trick: > > TYPE: Rehearsal > TYPE: Soundcheck > TYPE: Studio (for album recording sessions, outtakes,etc.) > TYPE: Public (for regular public performances) > > the field does not need to exist in every record, in which > case the default is to assume "Public". > > you could also have TYPE: Television and TYPE: Radio or > just include them under Studio. > > you could also have TYPE: Private to differentiate > non-public performances, like the 12/6/80 benefit at the Mill > Valley Rec Ctr. > > - jfw >
