Mihai, > thanks for clearing things up. guess I have to code the integration logic > by hand (along the lines of the pre-MeshWorker version of step-12).
Actually, I think you probably *should* use the MeshWorker framework. The reason you get linker errors is simply because the classes you are missing are not instantiated for 1d, see for example the file deal.II/source/numerics/mesh_worker_info.cc. Instead of reinventing the wheel, let's just try to these instantiations work in 1d as well. So I've made things to at least compile in revision 21614. By simply disabling all face integration stuff since the FEFaceValues and FESubFaceValues classes don't work in 1d. Now, I'm under no illusion that things will work in 1d because integration has to work differently there. Can you try out how far you get when you use these classes in 1d and let us know where the next roadblock is? Maybe we can jointly figure out what to do about things. Best Wolfgang ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Wolfgang Bangerth email: [email protected] www: http://www.math.tamu.edu/~bangerth/ _______________________________________________ dealii mailing list http://poisson.dealii.org/mailman/listinfo/dealii
