Oh, I see. Sorry, my fault.

Thanks for your help.
Martin

On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 7:20 PM, Wolfgang Bangerth <[email protected]>wrote:

>
> > I think it is rather an issue of implementation to get the terms
> > contributing to the off-diagonal blocks in the mass matrix right.
> > Essentially its the velocity basis functions in an inner product with the
> > bases coming from the pressure space.
>
> What Markus is saying that the correct term can not have the form
>   (phi_u, phi_p)
> since the first factor is a vector and the second is a scalar. The result
> of
> the integration is a vector, but in a bilinear form you need a scalar as a
> result. It could be that you need to take a *particular component* of
> phi_u,
> but that there is no telling without knowing where the problem came from.
> As
> it stands, the bilinear form you should doesn't make any sense because it
> adds scalars and vectors together.
>
> Best
> W.
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Wolfgang Bangerth                email:            [email protected]
>                                 www: 
> http://www.math.tamu.edu/~bangerth/<http://www.math.tamu.edu/%7Ebangerth/>
>
>


-- 
*Martin Stoll*
*Postdoctoral Research Fellow*

Computational Methods in Systems and Control Theory
Max Planck Institute for Dynamics of Complex Technical Systems
Sandtorstr. 1
D-39106 Magdeburg
Germany


Email: [email protected]
URL : http://www.mpi-magdeburg.mpg.de/people/stollm
Tel :+49 391 6110 384
_______________________________________________
dealii mailing list http://poisson.dealii.org/mailman/listinfo/dealii

Reply via email to