death penalty news

June 3, 2004


IRAN:

PROFESSOR ESCAPES DEATH PENALTY

Iran: Iran's Supreme Court has lifted a death sentence against a University 
Professor who questioned the nation's clerical rule, for a second time, 
overruling a lower court that insisted on its original blasphemy verdict.

Hashem Aghajari, a history professor at Tehran's Teachers Training 
University, had been condemned to death for blasphemy and insulting Islam 
and questioning clerical rule during a speech in June 2002.

(source: Star of Mysore, India)


=============================

UGANDA:

Why Uganda's child molesters don't go to jail

Incidents of sexual abuse, particularly of children, appear to be on the 
rise in Uganda. However, this apparent increase has not been matched by a 
similar rise in prosecutions. Instead, many families are still choosing to 
settle the cases out of court -- despite the effect this could have on 
abuse victims.

According to police statistics, 804 cases of sexual abuse of minors were 
reported in 2001, 988 in 2002 and 3 052 in 2003. In addition, 52 rape cases 
were reported in 2001, 93 in 2002 and 181 in 2003.

However, the African Network for the Prevention and Protection against 
Child Abuse and Neglect (ANPPCAN) -- a Nairobi-based NGO -- has highlighted 
the fact that reported cases may only be the tip of the iceberg.

In a report entitled Innocence at Stake: A Situation Analysis of Child 
Abuse in Uganda that was published last year, ANPPCAN says the findings of 
police, hospitals, media, the Uganda Human Rights Commission and other NGOs 
indicate that 4 495 minors were sexually abused in 2002.

"Girls were the major victims of abuse, accounting for 85,8% of the cases 
reported," the document says, adding that most abused children were between 
nine and 17 years. Ninety percent of the alleged perpetrators were close 
relatives.

Still, strong cultural practices, shame and ignorance of the law are 
preventing abuses from being brought to court. Lengthy hearings and 
cross-examinations that put the victim on trial also play a part in this -- 
as well a reluctance to put perpetrators in a position where they may have 
to face the death penalty.

It is a capital offence sexually to abuse a minor in Uganda. The minimum 
sentence is seven years' imprisonment.

As a result, many families resort to out-of-court settlements that may 
involve the abuser making a payment of cows, goats, hens, sheep, clothes or 
money.

"Much as it would hurt me so much to see my daughter sexually abused, 
taking the issue to the courts of law and exposing her would just cause 
more pain for both of us," says Jessica Nanfuka, a mother of two daughters.

"And it's nothing to do with the financial benefits here. It's just a 
better way in a society like ours ... We avoid shame, and protect our 
daughters," she says.

According to the ANPPCAN report, 92 defilement cases were handled by the 
High Court in 2002. However, only 38 of the alleged perpetrators were 
convicted. Nine were acquitted, while two had the cases against them dismissed.

A sizable number of the remaining cases ran into difficulties because 
witnesses failed to appear in court.

"People are not vigilant in going to court to testify because of the 
lengthy procedures. They often give up and the magistrates cannot go on," 
says Sarah Mwebaze, a programme officer at the Ugandan chapter of ANPPCAN.

Some are not even aware of the procedure to follow when a child is abused.

"They come to us when they have not even gone to the police and no police 
surgeon has carried out a medical examination," Mwebaze adds. As a result, 
evidence of the crime is lacking.

"The community is still ignorant about what should be evidence and what 
should not. They also do not prioritise the legal way," she says. "They 
feel that paying money to a police surgeon -- for those who know he exists 
-- it's a waste of time and money."

Some Ugandans also shy away from the prospect of being instrumental in the 
death penalty being imposed on an abuser. This is especially true of 
instances where the accused is a relative, or in villages where people have 
closer relationships than is the case in urban areas.

"I would not like to send my sister's son to jail, one who could actually 
be facing death because he had an affair with a teenage girl. That is one 
of the reasons why reporting cases of defilement is a bit low, and why 
people prefer to solve the issue out of court," Mwebaze says.

Even the structure of Uganda's court system plays a part in preventing 
trails from going to term.

A 1998 statute gave local council (LC) courts a certain amount of authority 
in cases that involve the sexual abuse of minors -- even though the 1995 
Constitution sees this crime as a capital offence, punishable only by the 
High Court.

This created a "grey area" where LC courts make rulings in abuse cases -- 
and appear to favour out-of-court settlements.

"It's our job to settle these problems. Many times, parents prefer to do it 
that way, and we are here to serve the people," says George Sserungoji, a 
local councillor in Uganda's capital, Kampala.

Rights activists disagree.

"Sexual abuse of minors is a capital offence. They are not cases to be 
solved by the LC courts. The LCs are only supposed to assist the police to 
get the offenders and not to judge cases," says Rosemary Nyakikongoro, an 
advocacy officer at Action for Development (Acfode), a women's NGO in Kampala.

Her words are echoed by Mwebaze: "In our advocacy programme, we are trying 
to emphasize to the LCs that their powers are limited to a point. There are 
some things they can do and [some] they cannot do. Of course it's a long 
route, but we have to start somewhere."

Certain court officials have argued that the management of abuse cases 
would be made easier if the age of consent in Uganda were lowered from 18 
to 16.

But, "As child rights advocates, we are against lowering the age of 
consent. We are also advocating for reducing the sentence to life, rather 
than death," Mwebaze says. This reduction in sentencing is contained in a 
proposed Sexual Offences Act.

Mwebaze adds that there is also a need for other penalty revisions. The 
punishments meted out to adults, she argues, should not necessarily be the 
same as those issued to teenagers: "A man of 45 years who defiles a girl of 
16 years should receive a different penalty from a teenager who commits the 
same crime."

Acfode has the same view. "The kind of punishment that is given to a person 
who has defiled a three-month-old baby should not be the same kind of 
punishment given to someone who has sexually abused a 17-year-old," says 
Nyakikongoro.

Acfode is now trying to make parents aware of how to care for children who 
have been sexually abused -- and to view them as something other than "spoilt".

"In one of our major sensitisation programmes, we are going to be targeting 
parents, the LC structures and the schools, because schools are big grounds 
for sexual harassment, including child-to-child sexual abuse," Nyakikongoro 
says.

(source: Mail & Guardian Online)


===========================

VIETNAM:

Vietnam executes five top gangsters

Vietnam Thursday executed gangster Truong Van Cam and four other members of 
a notorious criminal gang that terrorized Ho Chi Minh City for 15 years.

The five were shot at dawn and buried at the site of their execution, in 
accordance with Vietnamese law.

The 57-year old mafia boss had run gambling dens, brothels, restaurants, 
and protection rackets in the Vietnamese capital. He was arrested in 
December 2001 and charged with murder, assault, gambling, bribery, and 
several other charges, Xinhua reported.

Cam was convicted of killing a rival gang member and giving bribes worth 
more than $150,000. The bribery charge alone merits capital punishment in 
Vietnam.

All together 155 defendants, including senior state officials, were 
prosecuted for belonging to or aiding Cam's gang. In addition to the four 
executed, sentences ranging from four years to life in prison were meted out.

(source: Big News Network, Australia)


============================

YEMEN:

Abu Hamza still wanted in Yemen

Soon after Abu Hamza Al-Masri was arrested last week in London based on 
terror charges in the United States, the Yemeni government demanded the 
extradition of the Muslim cleric to Yemen.
Mohieddine Al-Dabi, Director General of Yemen's Ministry of Interior, said 
the government is pushing for Abu Hamza to stand trial for his involvement 
in terrorist crimes in Yemen in 1998.
"We will exert major efforts with the United States to have Abu Hamza 
Al-Masri turned over to Yemen in case he was handed over by London to 
Washington," said Al-Dabi last Saturday, two days after Abu Hamza was 
arrested.

Abu Hamza is wanted in Yemen on charges of orchestrating terrorist 
activities while being based in Britain. He is suspected of being involved 
in the kidnapping of 16 Western tourists in December 1998. Four of the 
hostages were killed during a rescue attempt carried out by the Yemeni army.
An official at the Ministry of Justice told Yemen Times that the Yemeni 
government has gathered enough evidence to prosecute Abu Hamza.
"Yemen has enough evidence, so the government wants to try him here where 
he committed terrorist crimes," said the judicial source. "With this much 
evidence, Yemen wants to put him on trial."

Yemen has been asking the British government for Abu Hamza's extradition 
for the last three years. Even though the Yemeni government has had a 
warrant for his arrest since 1999, the requests for his extradition have 
been denied.
According to British Home Secretary David Blunkett, Britain would not send 
Abu Hamza to Yemen because he could possibly face the death penalty.

Abu Hamza's son was arrested by Yemeni authorities in 1998 on charges of 
plotting terror attacks and has served time in prison.
If Abu Hamza, who was born in Egypt as Mustafa Kamel Mustafa but holds a 
British passport, is extradited to the United States, he will face an 
11-count indictment which was filed by a US federal court.

Along with plotting the kidnapping in Yemen, the indictment includes Abu 
Hamza attempting to put together a terrorist training camp in Oregon in 
1999. He is also accused of recruiting at least one man to an Al-Qaeda 
training camp in Afghanistan and providing material support to Al-Qaeda in 
1999 and 2000. It is believed that Abu Hamza was a spiritual inspiration to 
Richard Reid, who attempted to detonate a shoe bomb on a flight from Paris 
to Miami in 2001, and Zacarias Moussaoui, who is being tried in a US 
federal court on terrorist charges.

"We are actively seeking Hamza's extradition from Great Britain to face 
justice in our courts on these serious charges," said US Attorney General 
John Ashcroft soon after the arrest.
Blunkett said Britain plans to carry out the extradition process quickly. 
An extradition treaty between the United States and Britain, which went 
into effect after the attacks on September 11, 2001, is to make the process 
for extraditing terror suspects easier.

One obstacle has been Britain's ban on the death penalty and sending 
suspects to countries that apply capital punishment. Abu Hamza may face the 
death penalty in the United States if found guilty of being involved in 
killing hostages. Blunkett has said that the two countries have already 
agreed that Abu Hamza would not face capital punishment in the United States.

Abu Hamza emmigrated to the United Kingdom in 1979. He went to Afghanistan 
in the eighties to fight with the Mujahadeen against Soviet troops and lost 
both of his forearms and an eye while handling an explosive device.
After returning to Britain, he preached at mosques in London and became 
known for delivering controversial sermons viewed as supporting a radical 
religious position. In 2003, he was banned from preaching at the Finsbury 
Park mosque in London after it was raided by anti-terrorist police. A year 
ago he was stripped of his British nationality on allegations of supporting 
terrorism, but last April he was given nine more months to appeal against 
the decision.

Although the United States holds that it has evidence to charge Abu Hamza, 
Britain claims it did not have enough evidence to take him to court.
"Had we evidence in this country of a crime here, then of course the police 
and the Attorney General would have taken action," said Blunkett.
Some Yemenis have expressed anger over the expected extradition to the 
United States.
"Once again it is the United States that decides what should be done," said 
one Yemeni. "The United States still thinks it rules the world and has a 
police force in every country. Besides, if he committed a crime in Yemen, 
he should go to court here."

Abu Hamza is now held in London without bail and an extradition hearing is 
scheduled for July 23.

(source: Yemen Times)

Reply via email to