death penalty news

October 7, 2004


CONNECTICUT:

State Preparing For First Execution Since 1960 - Governor Says She Has No 
Power To Stay Execution

Gov. M. Jodi Rell said she is prepared to uphold the law, and she said she 
has no power to stay the execution or grant a pardon for Ross.

"I do support the death penalty in those areas where the crime is the most 
heinous, and this certainly fits that," Rell said.

A spokeswoman for the state Department of Correction would not discuss the 
specific preparations being made for the execution.

"We have several months in which to make the necessary preparations, and we 
will be ready to carry out the mandate of the law," agency spokeswoman 
Stacy Smith said.

Ross, 45, is on death row for killing four young women in eastern 
Connecticut in the 1980s. Altogether, he killed eight women -- two others 
in Windham County and two in New York -- and is serving more than two life 
sentences in prison.

A state judge set the Jan. 26 execution date after Ross said in court that 
he does not want to pursue any more appeals.

The state Supreme Court has upheld six death sentences against him, but 
Ross could still pursue a U.S. Supreme Court review, a pardon or a petition 
of habeas corpus.

Relatives of the victims and others accused Ross of manipulating the 
criminal justice system and said they are skeptical that Ross will go 
forward with his plan to die.

His lawyer, T.R. Paulding, insisted that Ross is sincere.

Paulding said Ross has not manipulated the system but has been forced by 
the courts to pursue appeals he did not want.

"He has not changed his mind," said Paulding, who spoke with Ross Thursday.

In court on Wednesday, Ross requested that he not be put in a medical unit 
because he does not want to continue with appeals.

Prison officials may see his decision as a suicidal act requiring medical 
attention, he said.

Paulding said Ross has not been put in the medical unit, but added that 
Ross was meeting with medical officials Thursday.

In any event, Paulding said, Ross still plans to forgo appeals, even if he 
is put in the medical unit.

Because Connecticut's last execution was in 1960, the Department of 
Correction will have to set up a system to administer the execution.

Under department policy, the warden of Osborn Correctional Institution in 
Somers will appoint a team of at least six correction staff members and six 
alternates to oversee the execution at the prison.

An executioner, who would administer a fatal dose of three chemicals, also 
must be appointed.

The team will have to conduct drills to simulate the movement and restraint 
of Ross on the execution day.

The warden also has to ensure that dedicated telephone lines are working 
and other equipment is in place for the execution.

Ross will have to decide if he wants a clergyman and up to three supporters 
to witness the execution, and a committee of news media representatives 
will have to select up to nine media witnesses.

Ross, who is now housed at the super-maximum security Northern Correctional 
Institution, will have to be moved to nearby Osborn at least a day before 
the execution.

The policy sets the execution time at 2:01 a.m., or as soon after as possible.

The lethal injection is made up of three chemicals: a lethal dose of 
thiopental sodium in solution, which causes sedation, then pancuronium 
bromide, which stops breathing, followed by potassium chloride, which stops 
the heart.

Paulding said the Corrections Department will have to work with some 
outdated laws that are still on the books.

For example, the law requires a prisoner about to be executed to be in a 
level five prison -- the highest security -- but Osborn is a level four.

Also, one old law that dates from when the main state prison was in 
Wethersfield states that the criminal could have to be housed and executed 
in the same place.

Ross does not plan to make an issue out of any of these technicalities, 
Paulding said.

Ross has stated that no one but Paulding may represent him or file appeals 
on his behalf, which would prevent anti-death penalty advocates from trying 
to intercede.

The state legislature has some outspoken opponents of the death penalty, 
although lawmakers have not tried to repeal it recently.

In the late 1990s, a bill to give the governor the power to stay an 
execution failed to pass.

Rep. Mike Lawlor, D-East Haven, co-chairman of the Judiciary Committee, 
doubts Ross will be executed on Jan. 26.

"This is more evidence that this whole death penalty as a public policy is 
self-defeating. It has cost an awful lot of money to go through this charade.

It's certainly cruel and usual punishment for the victims' families," 
Lawlor said. "What's the point?"

(source: NBC)

Reply via email to