Feb. 3 IRAQ: Why Killing Saddam Backfired on Bush----Dying Well Dying well used to be a popular topic for discussion and a trope for art. Paintings of just men dying peacefully in bed and distraught debauched sinners mad at their final moment were exempla for everyone. Live well, die well, was the message. As you sow, so shall you reap. We'll read in your end image your whole story. Accordingly, Saddam Hussein's death disappointed many. He seemed composed and dignified, contemptuous of his angry taunting executioners. Not a satisfying picture for those who wanted to make him thoroughly monstrous, nor quite comforting either to those who think vengeance effects justice. Properly paradoxical. The US had tried to make him look bad when he was captured, showing gloved captors probing his wild hair and mouth. For those who understood the biblical myths undergirding the US invasion, this echoed the bestialized Nebuchadnezzar in Daniel, humbled by the almighty Hebrew god, a presage of how Babylon falls to Jerusalem in Revelation. But Saddam Hussein, once the grinning dealmaker with Donald Rumsfeld, managed his own image. The gun-brandisher, pseudo-Saladin gave way to the aggrieved lawyer and occasional preacher. At his end he reproached the taunting executioners that they failed to act like men. He looked better than the executers of 'justice,' who seemed brutal and bloodthirsty. Saddam rehabilitated his image many said bitterly. Which goes to show a certain volatility of human opinion. A few days later tapes of Saddam speaking of his calculated chemical poisoning surfaced, no doubt to shift the wind of opinion by reasserting the monster. Which goes to show not only what Krishna remarked-that no man is entirely good and no man is entirely evil-but that we're buffeted by sham morality plays and images night to morn. On 15 January 2007, Saddam's co-defendants were also hanged. The reports said they were in orange jumpsuits and black hoods and they were trembling. The US had insisted their executions be proper, unlike Saddam's. Executioners and witnesses had to sign statements promising good behavior. But Saddam's half-brother Barzan Ibrahim al-Tikriti got decapitated by the hanging. The image was macabre and was immediately guarded by the government which says it may not be publically shown. NYTimes reporter John Burns, with a select group, viewed the videotape and attested it showed the condemned fall and have his head snap off. Burns theorized that the eight-foot drop calculation was too long, causing the mishap. Some claimed the decapitation was an act of God, others saw the viciousness or ineptness of the government. Whatever the case, al-Tikriti didn't die well image-wise and it reflected badly on the executioners. Burns also noted that both condemned were "distinctly frightened." He commented that Saddam's admired fearlessness at his death was no doubt related to his lack of conscience. Even top reporters interpret deaths and press for telling stories. Coverage paid little attention to the death prayers uttered by the condemned. If you consent to killing the wicked you have to keep asserting their wickedness over your own. St. Paul remarked that it was hard to preach Christ crucified because a hero who dies a criminal death is not attractive. He looks like a criminal even though he may be innocent and the executioners guilty. And he looks defeated and weak. He doesn't struggle or fight death, doesn't die like a warrior. Early Byzantine Christians pictured Christ on the cross only in vestments of glory-moving to the real end of the story which was Christ's justifying resurrection, the triumph of his life over death. Paul argued that this was the story to preach-not the death by crucifixion. That was, he said. to the Jews a stumbling block, and to the Gentiles a scandal. Christ's death and Socrates' are both frequently cited as examples of injustice. History has regarded them as moral heros and their executions as wrongful. Both appealed to an afterlife for vindication. Both are seen as dying well. Christ surrenders to man's brutality and reveals and forgives it. Socrates accepts death's inevitability and drinks the poison himself. A lot depends on what you think death means. It's the last act you play in your earthly drama. Socrates argued that the conventional idea of 'swan song' was wrong. People think the swan intensely mourns his last breath, singing as it parts from sweet life, he said. But on the contrary, he continued, the swan is Apollo's bird and sings with joy at the prospect of immortality. The death song is beautiful, but the meaning is arguable in the case of the swan. Commentators on the Iraqi condemned are not so theoretical. Most prefer the condemned be execrable in their ends or they mourn the executioners' clumsiness. Some condemn the death penalty itself, seeing in its rationale the same commitment to violence which defined the wicked. It is not just paradoxical that these images of dying look bad. They could look good only abstractly-spun out of the images into fantasies of justice and evil. Hiding the human face is a revealing technique in torture and in execution. Saddam was smart to refuse the hood. He faced his executioners and death. President Bush who sought and applauded Saddam's execution as justice said he didn't watch the whole thing, didn't want to. He did see the internet video he said but stopped watching before the last moments. Was he signaling sensitivity to the death moment, the ugliness of bulging eyes and twisted neck, or the specific brutality of real hanging? Or was it faintheartedness, or not wanting to see Saddam look human in death. The brutal dictator whose pistol Bush displays as a war trophy in the Oval Office, whose callous cruelties he condemned, who bluffed him into war, looked good in his end and the President famously doesn't like contradictions of his evaluations. Saddam's dying well strikes to the deeper issue of acts and ends and agency. The President who relentlessly became 'a war president' embraced killing and destruction as a solution to 'evil.' His nemesis, Saddam Hussein, embraced killing and destruction for political power. What ends justify what means? It is hard to make a man you kill look evil. He looks vulnerable. You look evil. Because you kill. And you don't wipe out 'bad' killing with 'good' killing, you echo it. Which the President and we choose not to see. (source: Diane Christian is SUNY Distinguished Teaching Professor at University at Buffalo and author of the new book Blood Sacrifice; CounterPunch) EUROPEAN UNION EU lawmakers want worldwide ban on death penalty Ratcheting up European Union efforts to ban the death penalty worldwide, EU lawmakers on February 1 called for immediate action to secure international support for the bid. A universal moratorium aimed at abolishing the death penalty worldwide should be established "immediately and unconditionally, Euro MPs said in a resolution. Germany, which currently holds the agenda-setting EU presidency, must act urgently and submit a resolution for such decree to the United Nations assembly, MEPs demanded. "The abolition of the death penalty contributes to the enhancement of human dignity and to the progressive development of human rights," Euro deputies stressed. The EU said the day before that it would continue to oppose capital punishment "in all cases and under all circumstances because it considers the death penalty to be a cruel and inhuman punishment." The 27-member bloc also said the death penalty, which is banned in Europe, had no deterring effect. In addition, 'any miscarriage or failure of justice is irreversible, when, in a cruel and inhumane way, the punishment deprives one of his or her right to life," the German EU presidency said in a statement. It also pointed out that the fight against terrorism was no reason or justification for introducing or restoring the death penalty. "Terrorism can be combated most effectively by adhering strictly to international law and respecting human rights," the EU said. Asked about European plans to submit an anti-death penalty resolution to the UN assembly, UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon said at a recent visit to EU headquarters that he was "encouraging the trend to phase out the death penalty." Past attempts to ban capital punishment at the UN level have failed. Human rights watchdog Amnesty International says that in 2005, at least 2,148 people were executed in 22 countries and at least 5,186 people were sentenced to death in 53 states worldwide. Some 94 % of all known executions took place in China, Iran, Saudi Arabia and the United States. China is leading the list with 1,770 executions, according to Amnesty. Iran executed at least 94 people, Saudi Arabia at least 86 and the US 60 people. Italy and its Prime Minister Romano Prodi are leading the fight. MEP Graham Watson of the UK, the leader of the European Liberals and Democrats group declared: "The death penalty casts a shadow on us as civilised Europeans. Now is the time to act to end such inhumane practices. Europe, thanks to the initiative of the Prodi Government, is waking up and assuming leadership of this campaign for a universal moratorium on the death penalty. "If abolition is the final goal, a moratorium could be the first step in the process. But it is important that Europe finds the greatest possible consensus in order to influence the debate in the United Nations." MEP Marco Pannella of Italy, who has consistently campaigned for an end to the death penalty, said: "For the General Assembly to avoid a decision on this issue now - in the current political climate and positive public opinion behind a moratorium - would constitute a serious set-back for this historical political goal which is beginning to take shape across the globe from Rwanda to Kyrgyzstan and to France, which is considering inserting a clause on abolition in its own Constitution." The European Parliaments 218-strong Socialist Group joined the calls for worldwide abolition of the death penalty. Its Vice-President Pasqualina Napoletano, who represented them at the World Congress Against the Death Penalty, held in Paris, said: "All governments that currently have the death penalty on their statute books should immediately call a halt to executions until the UN general assembly has voted." MEP Simon Coveney of Ireland said a global moratorium on the death penalty would be an enormous step forward towards achieving the ultimate aim of putting an end to the use of the death penalty. He said, "China continues to execute more people than any other country where the death penalty is in place. I am regularly critical of the lack of human rights advancement in the country," and he said some reforms may be intended to placate the international community before next years Olympic Games in Beijing. (source: New Europe News) INDIA: Indian hangman keeps alive death penalty debate As rights activists gather in Paris to campaign against the death penalty, an 87-year-old hangman sits in a tiny room passionately defending his profession though he is bitter about all the "false" promises the state made to him. More than 600 academics, lawyers, relatives of crime victims, journalists and rights activists have converged in Paris for the 3rd World Congress Against the Death Penalty Friday and Saturday. But in Nata Mullick it has a sceptic. "If criminals are not punished, there would be more such terrible crimes. Capital punishment creates fear in people's mind and prevents them from committing crime," Mullick told IANS at his house in a narrow alley of Tollygunge in south Kolkata. He recalls the events of August 2004 when rape and murder convict Dhanonjoy Chatterjee was hanged. "Should a person like Chatterjee who raped and brutally murdered a 14-year-old girl be kept alive? Should a terrorist like Mohammad Afzal Guru who was recently sentenced to death for his role in a plot to blow up the Indian parliament be kept alive? I don't think so," says Mullick. Though he is not keeping well these days, Mullick is a much-in-demand stage performer as an artiste of the jatra folk theatre. But it's his profession as a hangman that is his claim to fame. The global media spotlight on Mullick as the perfect hangman chosen to perform the execution of Chatterjee had triggered a debate over capital punishment. "People like Dhanonjoy are not human. They have no right to live," he says. "Terrorists like Afzal Guru also have no right to live. "I also think that innocents cannot be hanged any more because capital punishment is pronounced after a very critical judicial process," he says. Lying in his bed against a paling pink wall adorned with numerous media clippings and the pantheon of Hindu gods he worships, Mullick says: "During hanging I don't suffer from any sense of guilt. I worship god, put flowers in the gallows. I seek pardon again and again. I also give alms to people to purify my soul." Nata Mullick is now a jatra artiste who is virtually more in demand than Bengali or even Bollywood film stars. "Everywhere I go people want to see me. So much so that I am more sought after than Bollywood star Shakti Kapoor or our Tollywood star Tapas Paul. My plays are full houses always," says Mullick. He performs in a melodrama titled "Desher Shatru Neta, Baper Shatru Beta" (Leader is the enemy of the nation, son is the enemy of the father). But Mullick is extremely bitter with the West Bengal government. "From the West Bengal jail minister to the inspector general of police (Prisons), everyone promised a job for my kin but what they offered at the end is most insulting. "I never wanted a job but they offered me one only to cheat me later. What my grandson was offered at the end is a contract job for Rs.2,500 a month, and that too renewable with a fresh application every year. He has not got salary for the past several months," Mullick says. "These jail officials, especially then IG (Prisons) Joydev Chakraborty, lied to me about a permanent job for my kin. These people make false promises when they need me for a hanging but never honour their words later." But with his jatra career taking off at this age, Mullick is better off now. "They offer me a car, pay me well. I am happy that way. But I am not keeping too well." Italy is spearheading a campaign to win support for an international moratorium on the death penalty - the ultimate punishment carried out each year against thousands of people around the globe. Delegates and decision-makers in Paris are discussing current strategies and issues relating to the goal of worldwide abolition of judicial killings. But if anyone asks Nata Mullick, he will have a different story to tell. (source: IANS)
[Deathpenalty] death penalty news----worldwide
Rick Halperin Mon, 5 Feb 2007 01:02:12 -0600 (Central Standard Time)
- [Deathpenalty] death penalty news----worldwide Rick Halperin
- [Deathpenalty] death penalty news----worldwide Rick Halperin
- [Deathpenalty] death penalty news----worldwide Rick Halperin
- [Deathpenalty] death penalty news----worldwide Rick Halperin
- [Deathpenalty] death penalty news----worldwide Rick Halperin
- [Deathpenalty] death penalty news----worldwide Rick Halperin
- [Deathpenalty] death penalty news----worldwide Rick Halperin
- [Deathpenalty] death penalty news----worldwide Rick Halperin
- [Deathpenalty] death penalty news----worldwide Rick Halperin
- [Deathpenalty] death penalty news----worldwide Rick Halperin
- [Deathpenalty] death penalty news----worldwide Rick Halperin
- [Deathpenalty] death penalty news----worldwide Rick Halperin
- [Deathpenalty] death penalty news----worldwide Rick Halperin
- [Deathpenalty] death penalty news----worldwide Rick Halperin
- [Deathpenalty] death penalty news----worldwide Rick Halperin
- [Deathpenalty] death penalty news----worldwide Rick Halperin
- [Deathpenalty] death penalty news----worldwide Rick Halperin
- [Deathpenalty] death penalty news----worldwide Rick Halperin
- [Deathpenalty] death penalty news----worldwide Rick Halperin
- [Deathpenalty] death penalty news----worldwide Rick Halperin
- [Deathpenalty] death penalty news----worldwide Rick Halperin