Feb. 23



LEBANON:

Samaha's plot: Gemayel calls for severing ties with Syria


Phalange Party official MP Sami Gemayel slammed on Friday the Lebanese authorities for not suspending diplomatic ties with Syria after the judiciary sought the death penalty for 2 Syrian security officials.

Gemayel wondered how the Syrian Ambassador to Lebanon, Ali Abdul Karim Ali, wasn't expelled or summoned.

Gemayel comment comes after State Commissioner to the Military Court Judge Saqr Saqr referred on Thursday a death penalty sought against ex-Minister Michel Samaha and Syrian security officials Ali Mamlouk and his aide Adnan to the military court to kick off trials.

The criminal court of cassation confirmed earlier on Friday receiving the file.

Gemayel addressed in his statements President Michel Suleiman, Prime Minister Najib Mikati and Foreign Minister Adnan Mansour, demanding an explanation.

"The Syrian regime is protecting them" Gemayel said in reference to Ali Mamlouk and his aide Adnan.

"We either respect our judiciary or we don't," the lawmaker added, stressing that the death penalty request requires the implementation of certain diplomatic measures concerning the relations between the 2 countries."

Earlier this week, First Military Examining Judge Riyad Abu Ghida indicted Samaha, and the 2 Syrian officials on terrorism charges.

The indictment charges the 3 men of holding a meeting under Mamlouk at the National Security office in the Syrian capital Damascus and plotting to assassinate Lebanese figures who are opposed to the Syrian regime.

According to the indictment, the Syrian officers handed Samaha explosives. It also charged Samaha of transporting the bombs in his car from Syria to Lebanon.

The former minister was also charged with summoning Lebanese police informer Milad Kfouri, handing him the explosives and ordering him to blow up Iftar gatherings in Lebanon.

"It's all right: kill them," Samaha was quoted as telling the police informer when the latter informed him that religious figures would be attending the Iftar dinners, according to the indictment.

The 3 could face the death penalty if convicted.

Abu Ghida also approved a request made last week by State Commissioner to the Military Court Judge Saqr Saqr to issue a search warrant to identify the Syrian colonel known only by his 1st name Adnan.

On August 9, Lebanese security forces arrested former Lebanese minister Samaha, who has close ties with Syria's regime.

According to Lebanese security sources, when asked why he would do such a thing, the former minister replied, "This is what Bashar wants." In a possible reference to the embattled Syrian president Bashar al Assad.

Following the discovery of the explosives that were transported from Syria by former Minister Samaha , Suleiman congratulated the Internal Security forces and announced that he is waiting for a phone call from President Assad about Syrian General Ali Mamlouk's alleged participation in a terrorist plot with Samaha. Suleiman is still waiting.

The current cabinet of PM Nagib Mikati is dominated by Hezbollah and was reportedly 'made in Syria'. Hezbollah has been supporting the Syrian regime in its crackdown against the pro democracy uprising. Over 70, 000 have been killed so far mostly civilians.

Foreign minister Mansour who is a member of the Amal movement, a close ally of Hezbollah has been accused on several occasions of acting on orders from Syria, but since Hezbollah dominates the cabinet PM Mikati cannot fire him.

(source: yalibnan.com)






BANGLADESH:

Protest demanding death penalty for 1971 war criminals divides Bangladesh----Gulf widens between those who think Shahbag Square rallies are righting historical wrong and those who see them as anti-Islam


Najmul Hossain had never been to a protest before. But for the past fortnight, the 45-year-old Bangladeshi banker has regularly made the short journey to Shahbag Square, a broad, tree-lined thoroughfare in the heart of Dhaka, the capital, to call for the hangings of Islamist politicians accused of war crimes during the country's 1971 war of independence.

On Saturday, Hossain took his 6-year-old son with him to the protest, holding a banner with the message, "Razakars [Islamist collaborators] must be hanged". The child carried a toy gun. "My uncle was killed in 1971 by the Pakistan army," Hossain said. "I cannot forgive those who killed and stood with the killers."

On the other side of town, Shamsuz Zaman, a 58-year-old timber trader, is equally fired up but for different reasons when discussing Shahbag. "War crimes are just an excuse," he said. "Bangladesh has so many problems. The people who are leading these mobs are atheists who insult Islam, God and the prophet." The gulf between those who think the Shahbag protests - the largest in 2 decades, that some are calling the Bangladesh spring - is a movement for righting a historical wrong and those who consider it to be a veiled, government-sponsored attempt to curb the influence of Islam has never been wider.

At least 5 people have been killed since Friday in countrywide violence, including 2 opposition activists who were shot dead by police on Saturday morning, local police officials confirmed. The violence began when conservative Islamists clashed with police after Friday prayers, protesting against what they said were blasphemous online posts by bloggers at the forefront of the Shahbag protests.

An alliance of Islamist parties called for a general strike on Sunday to protest at what they see as the use of excessive force against opposition activists. The police said they were trying to maintain law and order.

Much of the mistrust is rooted in Bangladesh's tumultuous past. Bangladesh declared independence from Pakistan in 1971. The Pakistani army fought and lost a brutal nine-month war with Bengali fighters and Indian forces that had intervened. Hundreds of thousands of civilians died, many of them at the hands of Islamist militia groups who wanted the country to remain part of Pakistan.

In 2010, Sheikh Hasina, the prime minister, and daughter of wartime political leader Sheikh Mujibur Rahman, set up a war crimes tribunal to investigate atrocities committed during the 1971 conflict - a move she said would bring closure for victims and families and heal the rifts of war.

The leader of the opposition Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP), Khaleda Zia, the widow of the independence war's best-known military commander, has accused Hasina of politicising the tribunal and conveniently using it to hound her political enemies. All of the 10 people indicted for war crimes by the tribunal are opposition politicians, eight of them from the Jamaat-e-Islami, the country's largest Islamist party and an ally of Zia's BNP.

Despite criticism from human rights groups about politicisation and procedural flaws, the war crimes tribunal has remained broadly popular. Last month the tribunal sentenced a former member of the Jamaat-e-Islami to death for his role in the 1971 war. On 5 February, a verdict of life imprisonment was delivered against Abdul Quader Molla, a senior leader of the Jamaat-e-Islami, sparking the Shahbag protests. Since then, hundreds of thousands of people have converged on Shahbag, the hub of protests, adamant that all of the men on trial for war crimes must receive the death penalty.

This week President Zillur Rahman signed into law an amendment to the statute that governs two functioning war crimes tribunals, giving prosecutors the power to seek stiffer sentences on appeal, a key demand of the protesters. The new law also gives the government the power to charge entire organisations with war crimes, another Shahbag demand.

The protesters, however, have ratcheted up the pressure, saying they will remain camped out in Shahbag until all of the accused currently before the war crimes tribunal are given the death sentence. They have pushed a broader set of demands, including banning the Jamaat-e-Islami and confiscating businesses linked to Islamist groups.

"We are protesting 40 years of injustice," said Lucky Akter, 23, a student and member of a leftwing political party who has become one of the faces of the protest with her fiery slogans. "We want those who collaborated with the Pakistan army hanged and their finances cut off."

Analysts say the broader demands from the Shahbag gathering show how the rifts of the past continue to play a major role in Bangladesh's present. "There is an ideological basis to protests," said Muhammad Musa, a political commentator and former newspaper editor. "There is the widespread perception that the Jamaat-e-Islami supported Pakistan during the war and should answer for this."

On Saturday a crowd in the thousands gathered in Shahbag, joining a hardcore group of activists, waving flags and chanting slogans such as, "Hang, hang, hang them all!" and, "The weapons of '71 must fire again!"

The Jamaat-e-Islami, whose activists have waged violent street agitations against the tribunal, says it is being scapegoated. Shafiqul Islam Masud, a party leader, said many people were blurring the difference between a political position and war crimes. "There are only about 50 people active in the party now who took any kind of a political position 42 years ago," he said. "It's possible some of them did not want to secede from Pakistan, but that's a far cry from war crimes. The party accepted the sovereignty of Bangladesh and is a registered political party, represented in parliament."

Sam Zarifi, the Asia director for the International Commission of Jurists (ICJ), a Geneva-based legal advocacy, said a fair trial process was necessary to heal the wounds of the war. "It is very important that victims of 1971 get justice," he said. "But justice must be ensured through a fair and transparent trial process. Unfortunately, if judges are intimidated by mass protests into handing out death sentences, that's not justice and may unleash yet another cycle of violence."

Such words of caution are dismissed by Shahbag protesters as intellectual posturing. The crimes of 1971, which have been thrust into the spotlight by the tribunals, have dominated Bangladeshi newspapers, airwaves and websites, uniting the youth of Dhaka in an unprecedented manner.

"The people have spoken," said Akter. "Now it is up to the courts and the politicians to implement."

Analysts say the protests have worked to the government's advantage and distracted attention from economic and governance issues the opposition had been agitating about. Last year, Hasina scrapped a constitutional provision under which a non-partisan caretaker government oversees elections, leading to the opposition threatening a boycott of parliamentary elections due in early 2014.

"Had it not been for the protests, now we would all be focusing on next year's elections and looking at the government's record in office and the opposition's pledges," said Zafar Sobhan, editor of the Dhaka Tribune, an English daily. "Now, all bets are off and elections seem a distant concern. It is hard to see how things will revert to politics as usual after this."

Asif Mohiuddin, a co-ordinator of the bloggers' network that called for the Shahbag protests, is keen to point out the group's struggle did not start with Shahbag. "We have been waging war on religious fundamentalists on the blogs for years," he said. "Shahbag has been successful because people are so outraged by the war crimes."

Yet some analysts say the narrative of a secular revolution leading the country towards a democratic future may be simplistic. The protests have polarised the country and led to tensions between those who identify themselves as progressive.

"Many are worried about the Shahbag protest's aggressive tone and narrow focus on the death penalty," said one of the editors of alalodulal.org, an English language blog. "I wish the unique energy of Shahbag could be channelled into the energy and desire to do thorough research, digging out solid evidence that can result in fair trials that do not require government contortions."

(source: The Guardian)






MALAYSIA:

Nigerian Student Arrested For Drug Trafficking In Malaysia


The National Drug Law Enforcement Agency has arrested a Nigerian student, Vitalis Dike, studying in Malaysia, for drug trafficking.

Dike was arrested at the Murtala Mohammed International Airport, Lagos, during the screening of passengers bound for Malaysia via a Qatari flight.

The suspect recently escaped death in the Asian country when he was arrested for being in possession of 1.430kg of methamphetamine.

Drug trafficking in Malaysia attracts the death penalty.

The 31-year-old suspect had 1.430kg of white crystalline powder that tested positive for methamphetamine concealed inside his luggage.

A native of Orlu, Imo State, Dike told Punch Metro that he was promised $4,000 to deliver the drugs in Malaysia.

He said, "I was asked to take an empty bag to Malaysia and in return get $4,000 but when I got to the airport, the drug was discovered."

Confirming the arrest, NDLEA Airport commander, Mr. Hamza Umar, said the drug was industrially packed in such a way that the agency had to cut the sides of the bag open with a knife to discover the drugs.

The commander said it would take a professional to detect the drugs.

In a related development, NDLEA officers at the Lagos airport discovered wraps of cocaine inside packs of baby powder meant for export to Gabon. The discovery was made inside a luggage containing artificial hair, perfumes and artificial nails.

The luggage was to be sent unaccompanied to Gabon via Askye Airline.

A suspect, Ebele Iwegbuna, has since been arrested in connection with the discovery.

Iwegbuna, a native of Orifite in Anambra state, in his statement, claimed that he was asked to send the goods to Gabon.

He said, "I was given N130,000 by my childhood friend to buy female hair attachments, artificial nails and perfumes.

"My friend later called to say that somebody would give me children's powder to add to what I bought. So the person called me and gave me the powder which I added to the goods. It was in the process of search that the cocaine was discovered. I am a technician and I specialise in the repairs of air conditioning units."

NDLEA Chairman/Chief Executive, Ahmadu Giade, who described the involvement of the suspects in drug trafficking as sad, urged members of the public to draw lessons from the arrests.

Giade said, "I want members of the public to learn from the experiences of the suspects. It is unfortunate that at a time when the country is making efforts to save her citizens who are on death row abroad, Dike is deliberately signing his death warrant."

(source: codewit.com)






JAPAN:

Executions show turn in death-penalty debate


Debate on the death penalty appears to have come to a standstill under the new Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) administration, with three people being hanged on Feb. 21 -- the 1st executions since the party took over the reins of government.

Japan has been advised by the United Nations to consider halting or abolishing executions. In 2009, the Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ) promised in its election pledge to debate whether to continue the death penalty and the method of execution, and when it took power that year, then Justice Minister Keiko Chiba set up a study panel on the death penalty within the Ministry of Justice. The panel was closed in March last year without a conclusion on whether to continue the death penalty, but discussion then began among the justice minister, senior vice minister of justice and the parliamentary secretary for justice on whether to reconsider hanging, the current method of execution.

However, under the LDP administration that debate has stopped. Justice Minister Sadakazu Tanigaki told news organizations in interviews in January that he didn't intend to carry out debate on making any quick changes to the execution method. At a press conference on Feb. 21 after the executions, he said, "The death penalty is a very important domestic issue. We need to think carefully about the maintenance of order, the feelings of the people, and how to secure the people's safety."

Amnesty International Japan's office head Hideki Wakabayashi said, "Japan is continuing to receive advisories from the United Nations about reconsidering the death penalty. If we do nothing we will be internationally isolated."

Meanwhile, Takeshi Tsuchimoto, former prosecutor at the Supreme Public Prosecutors Office and now professor emeritus of criminal law at the University of Tsukuba, says, "The death penalty system should continue," but says, "It is possible that execution by hanging could violate the Constitution's ban against cruel punishment. I think execution by lethal injection is acceptable. The Ministry of Justice should hold debate that includes the victims of crime."

(source: Opinion, The Mainichi)

************************************

Nonpartisan lawmaker group protests hanging of 3 inmates


Members of a nonpartisan legislator group seeking to abolish the death penalty lodged a protest Friday with Justice Minister Sadakazu Tanigaki over Thursday's execution of 3 death-row inmates.

Shizuka Kamei, who heads the group, urged Tanigaki to proactively inform the public about the global trend to end capital punishment.

"People are not informed enough about the fact that the number of countries abolishing the death penalty is increasing. It is the Justice Ministry's duty to provide such important information" to the public, Kamei said.

Kamei quoted Tanigaki as saying he will "think hard about how the capital punishment system should be."

(source: Japan Times)






UNITED KINGDOM/INDIA:

UK Sikh body angry at PM David Cameron's iciness over June 1984 massacre


It is learnt the Sikhs in Britain have expressed anger over the British Prime Minister David Cameron's failure to sympathise with the Sikhs for the events of June 1984 when the Indian Army used tanks and artillery to attack the Harmander Sahib, the Golden Temple Complex in Amritsar to kill thousands of innocent Sikh pilgrims.

Sikh Federation (UK) said that there was a lot of talk about the 1919 Amritsar massacre and while it was welcome David Cameron expressed sorrow over that tragedy but with an eye on "trade deals" the PM didn't utter a word about "India's own massacre in Amritsar in June 1984".

Prime Minister said at Amritsar: "This was a deeply shameful event in the British history - one that Winston Churchill rightly described at the time as monstrous. We must never forget what happened here. And in remembering, we must ensure that the United Kingdom stands up for the right to peaceful protest anywhere in the world."

Gurjeet Singh, Sikh Federation's spokesman said PM Cameron has not won over Sikhs to his party and it will hurt his party in the constituencies where Sikhs live in large numbers. Singh said the Conservatives should realise that the 1984 massacre "is far more important than the 1919 massacre given that the majority of British Sikhs are born in the UK and the events of 1984 are very fresh in their minds and many of those who perpetrated those killings of innocent Sikh pilgrims have not been punished".

Bhai Amrik Singh, the chairman of the Sikh Federation (UK) said Sikhs would have greatly appreciated a public apology from the British Prime Minister for the bloody massacre in Amritsar. He said it is on record that he along with around another 180 UK MPs specifically supported opposition against the death penalty against Professor Davinderpal Singh Bhullar and called for his release by signing an Early Day Motion before he became leader of the Conservatives and Prime Minister. Prime Minister Cameron, he said, should have used this opportunity to reach out to the British Sikhs and "demonstrate the UK will not be constantly blackmailed by threats to trade deals by India".

"David Cameron also failed to publicly condemn India for 2 hangings in the last 3 months and the growing trend to hang others despite many letters from UK MPs prior to his visit to condemn India for moving in this direction."

(source: sikhsiyasat.com)


_______________________________________________
DeathPenalty mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.washlaw.edu/mailman/listinfo/deathpenalty

Search the Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
A free service of WashLaw
http://washlaw.edu
(785)670.1088
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Reply via email to