Howdy,
i dont want to start a rant lol but:
for ArchLinux this is not totaly correct. There is Talkingarch as
useable installation medium (its not an fully customized distro but
just an accessible installation medium that could been used to create
an accessible operationg system setup).
Maybe its an good to know some of my software or add it to the repo
(some people find that stuff very helpful):
- OCRdesktop (useful reading pictures or interact with non accessible
software)
https://wiki.linux-a11y.org/doku.php?id=ocrdesktop
- SOPS (Simple Orca Plugin System, provides stuff like read clipboard to orca)
https://wiki.linux-a11y.org/doku.php?id=simple_orca_plugin_system
- OCRPDF (just a small read that damn scanned PDF viewer)
- fenrir (still a early bird but useable for most cases if you manage
the installation lol)
https://wiki.linux-a11y.org/doku.php?id=fenrir_user_manual
more stuff is comming ;)
cheers chrys
Zitat von MENGUAL Jean-Philippe <mengualjean...@free.fr>:
Morally speaking, Debian is simply the most accessible distro today. So
it is an example in itself. And it is the only distro where in
decisionsal processes, accessibility is considered as a matter (eg
choice of desktop environment). Ubuntu stopped specific devs in
accessibility, Fedora is not really accessible at install, using a
non-universal desktop; Manjaro does not seem to do accessibility,
neither arch. It is so right that some devs decided using specialized
distros such as Vinux.
So I think Debian does its role in free software.
Le 24/08/2017 à 23:01, Samuel Wales a écrit :
moral leadership can be powerful all by itself.
On 8/24/17, Samuel Thibault <sthiba...@debian.org> wrote:
Samuel Wales, on jeu. 24 août 2017 13:46:35 -0700, wrote:
practically everything in debian is an upstream issue, except e.g. pm,
installer, repo, right?
Yes.
actually no -- policy is a debian issue. :) i'd like debian to be a
sort of moral leader if nothing else. debian articulates a goal. i'd
like accessibility to be part of that.
Yes, but only for what Debian is supposed to act on. It's not supposed
to modif software. Patching over issues is fine enough, provided that
the patches are also sent upstream. But whole features of upstream
software are not supposed to be developped within Debian.
Samuel
--
signature_jp_2
Logo Hypra JEAN-PHILIPPE MENGUAL
DIRECTEUR TECHNIQUE ET QUALITÉ
102, rue des poissonniers, 75018, Paris
Tel : +331 84 73 06 61 <tel:+33184730661> Mob : +336 76 34 93 37
<tel:+33676349337>
jpmeng...@hypra.fr <mailto:jpmeng...@hypra.fr>
www.hypra.fr <http://www.hypra.fr/>
Facebook Hypra <https://www.facebook.com/hyprasoftware/> Twitter Hypra
<https://twitter.com/Hypra_> Linkedin Jean-Philippe
<https://fr.linkedin.com/in/jean-philippe-mengual-800133135>
