On Sun, Jan 10, 1999 at 06:54:25PM +0100, Martin Bialasinski wrote: > >> "MJH" == Mikolaj J Habryn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > MJH> So, a new package can drop package-specific variable descriptions > MJH> neatly into that hierarchy, run update-variables, and forget about > MJH> them, other than filing a bug report against whichever package they > MJH> should be moved into. The question of which package /should/ contain > MJH> them I'll leave open. > > I don't fuly understand this: Do you suggest these files should also > hold the value this variable should use, so that the postinst script > would use the value instead asking the user?
This is how I understood it.
> I think this is like the database Wichert will work on, no?
If I am not mistaken Wichert wanted a central config database as a package.
Problem: A new package might need some configuration option which is not in
the config-package.
Mikolaj just suggested to have each option described with the package.
> Otherwise: what use would these description have?
It supplies the information what this option is about, for example:
mail/smarthost:
This is the host all mail is forwarded to.
[...]
> Ciao,
> Martin
cu
Torsten
pgpv3IgI1t3YB.pgp
Description: PGP signature
