Ed Cogburn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tuesday 10 May 2005 1:33pm, Lennart Sorensen wrote: >> On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 01:12:22PM -0400, Ed Cogburn wrote: >> > Just trying to be helpful and point out to those developers that's there >> > no reason to hold back non-free at all. There isn't a problem, except >> > the one they are conjuring up. Besides, according to Goswin in the post >> > you responded to, it could be 3 years, not 3 weeks, by his logic (which I >> > disagree with as well). >> >> So you think Etch will be released soon? > > > If you had read my response to Goswin, you would know we aren't talking about > release dates for anything, I'm talking about Sid, which will eventually > become Etch, but obviously will exist for a long time before Etch does. :) > The issue here is just the co-location of non-free and the AMD64 repository > (whatever its called, wherever its located). Those 2 will find themselves > together again on debian.org long before Etch sees the light of day, but the > point is there is no reason to separate them *now*.
And that is where you are wrong. The amd64.debian.net archive is for sarge/stable as much as anything else. If the plan where to merge into debian completly when etch comes to live we wouldn't have moved to a new server one month before that happens. MfG Goswin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]