I would like to know that also, my cpu0 is always under some load, and the cpu1 usually just sit tight... when I am not running some simulation.
2007/8/23, Michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Lennart, > > > probably don't have any good reason to. The scheduler does a great job > > Do you know if the kernel tries to balance load really equally ? > For my 2core AMD64 it seems cpu0 has to be about >70% before cpu1 gets > involved. > Another idea is, i always see cpu0 is the most busy one. But wouldn't > switching the 'most busy cpu' from 0 to 1 at certain intervals (say, 3 > seconds) reduce heat ? > > > m° > > -- ----------------------------------------------------------- Ivan S. P. Marin ----------------------------------------------------------
