On Thu, Jul 15, 2010, Paul Brook wrote: > A simple benchmark confirms this hypothesis. > softfp is actually faster in many cases.
Could we consider it a gcc bug that when hardfp is turned on, it could still pick a faster soft float code path and doesn't? -- Loïc Minier -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
