Hi, On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 10:29 AM, Andreas Tille <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > Good. This enabled me spotting one thing. For official Debian packages > we have no information about the license in UDD. However, we can assume > that it is "DFSG free". This is what I had inserted for official > packages in main. > > In contrest to packages in contrib / non-free the string "non-free" is > injected (which is not fully correct for packages in contrib - feel free > to add the first enhancement here and use "DFSG free" also for packages > in contrib). >
I have solved the licensing issue for official packages. For : 'main' : DFSG Free 'contrib' : 'DFSG free, but needs non-free components 'non-free' : non-free The license for prospective packages is obtained from UDD and the license of new_packages should be unknown . Am I right ? Regards, Akshita
