Hi Akshita, On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 03:54:17PM +0530, Akshita Jha wrote: > > Sound perfect. May be we need to shorten the text for contrib a bit since > > it might spoil the layout. > > Hmm. We can think about it.
Somehow a "one liner" would be better. I'll sleep about it ... > > Hmmm, thinking twice about it: New packages are also featuring a > > section field. So we can even now tell whether the license is "DFSG > > Free", ... This might change according to the acceptance from ftpmaster > > but this is at least the knowledge we currently have. > > I have added the license information for new packages along with license > info for official and prospective packages. +1 > > I think you could implement this right now > > Implemented and pushed to the repo. Please check. The diff uncovered that for all packages there is: "Debian package not available" instead of a link http://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=<packagename> Please check this. (I'm happy about the test script ;-)) > > and we leave the license > > field for new packages for the long term todo list with low relevance. > > Done. Added this to my todo list. Good! I'm happy about the current progress Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: https://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
