Hi Akshita,
On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 02:19:10PM +0530, Akshita Jha wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 3:50 PM, Andreas Tille <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > BTW, it somehow seems the trouble with not importet references for
> > prospective packages remains. It seems to happen only on udd.debian.org
> > (not on my local clone).
>
> I am sorry but I don't completely understand the issue. The publications
> information for prospective packages is being added to tasks pages [0].
I think the problem is that there are several jobs dealing with the
bibref table. If not all jobs are finished and the tasks pages are
created the table is incomplete. My temporary hack was to delay the
tasks pages creation two hours later seemed to have worked but that's
not a solution. The proper way would be to merge
bibref+ftpnew+blends-prospective all in one transaction to make sure
that at all times the information is complete.
> > I do not understand this issue at all but I
> > think we should really put bibref + ftpnew + blends-prospective in a
> > single transaction which makes sense in any case.
> >
>
> I am unable to clearly understand what you mean by a single transaction. Do
> you mean merging the scripts bibref_gatherer.py, ftpnew_gatherer.py and
> blends_prospective_gatherer.py ?
Yes.
> Can you please elaborate a little on this ?
Was my explanation above precise enough?
> I am sorry for the late response. I'll work on this and importing
> prospective package information at the earliest.
No need to sorry - I was delaying things on my end as well...
Kind regards
Andreas.
> [0]
> https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/blends/website.git/commit/?id=c9481c41ebb3c790ba8f73e10b1639dee221e7ab
--
http://fam-tille.de
