Hi Akshita,
did you found any time to work on this or was my mail not precise
enough?
Kind regards
Andreas.
On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 11:57:52AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Akshita,
>
> On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 02:19:10PM +0530, Akshita Jha wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 3:50 PM, Andreas Tille <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > BTW, it somehow seems the trouble with not importet references for
> > > prospective packages remains. It seems to happen only on udd.debian.org
> > > (not on my local clone).
> >
> > I am sorry but I don't completely understand the issue. The publications
> > information for prospective packages is being added to tasks pages [0].
>
> I think the problem is that there are several jobs dealing with the
> bibref table. If not all jobs are finished and the tasks pages are
> created the table is incomplete. My temporary hack was to delay the
> tasks pages creation two hours later seemed to have worked but that's
> not a solution. The proper way would be to merge
> bibref+ftpnew+blends-prospective all in one transaction to make sure
> that at all times the information is complete.
>
> > > I do not understand this issue at all but I
> > > think we should really put bibref + ftpnew + blends-prospective in a
> > > single transaction which makes sense in any case.
> > >
> >
> > I am unable to clearly understand what you mean by a single transaction. Do
> > you mean merging the scripts bibref_gatherer.py, ftpnew_gatherer.py and
> > blends_prospective_gatherer.py ?
>
> Yes.
>
> > Can you please elaborate a little on this ?
>
> Was my explanation above precise enough?
>
> > I am sorry for the late response. I'll work on this and importing
> > prospective package information at the earliest.
>
> No need to sorry - I was delaying things on my end as well...
>
> Kind regards
>
> Andreas.
>
>
> > [0]
> > https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/blends/website.git/commit/?id=c9481c41ebb3c790ba8f73e10b1639dee221e7ab
>
> --
> http://fam-tille.de
>
>
--
http://fam-tille.de
